WINRUNNER OVERVIEW VERIFICATION
Apply and use different verification techniques Understand the benefits and proper approach to test automation Describe the function and purpose of Selenium
These testers maybe new to test automation and may also include quality assurance practitioners, managers, or team leaders who are responsible for interacting with testers or who need to ensure that the tools are being implemented fully and appropriately.Īt the end of the course, you will be able to:
WINRUNNER OVERVIEW SOFTWARE
The target audience is software testers who are seeking to automate the testing of web applications using Selenium. Testers can build, enhance, and maintain scripts using both the Selenium IDE and the Selenium 2 WebDriver. The whole evaluation report can be found here ( PDF).This introductory course is designed to familiarize testing professionals with the basics of testing web applications using Selenium. Mark Michaelis, Software Engineer Quality Assurance, ISTQB Certified Tester And great new features were introduced like dependencies I use a lot meanwhile.Īnd one last word about the company size: Of course I totally misjudged the company size and I am happy to know some more people at QFS now. the “lazy variable expansion bug” as I call it, which was not a bug but a different approach to handle variable expansion. So it’s no wonder that some flaws I mentioned I fixed meanwhile. QF-Test still gets better from release to release. Most of the times I only need to introduce them for one or two hours and they start right away. But it’s QF-Test which enabled me to build such a framework.Īlso CoreMedia developers who don’t write QF-Tests every day feel very comfortable with QF-Test. Where every single line points to a function/procedure in the framework I built up.
WINRUNNER OVERVIEW CODE
It allows me to have tests which read in the code tree just like: To some extent I might say it’s my framework I built meanwhile. It’s always a pleasure to write tests in QF-Test as they are easy to create. While I still have to maintain WinRunner Tests and recently had strong problems with Java 1.6 and Windows Vista QF-Test just works as fine on Java 1.6/Windows Vista as on Windows XP with Java 1.5 or 1.4. I am still happy we made the decision to switch to QF-Test. There is no way for automatically converting those tests and thus every test has to be converted by hand. Today we still use QF-Test – and we still use WinRunner, because we didn’t manage to get time for converting the tests in WinRunner to tests in QF-Test.
you just read through the original report from now nearly two years ago. Just as the conclusion which was delayed after the creation of the evaluation report this epilogue also is not part of the original evaluation report. But eventually we decided to buy licenses of QF-Test. The conclusion has not been made during the evaluation phase as also other options have been taken into account for creating more tests for the Swing Editor. The target of the evaluation process is to decide if we want to replace (at least for further development) WinRunner as GUI testtool with QF-Test and to document the reasons for the decision. This document holds the information what caused the decision for or against the new GUI testtool. In December 2005/January 2006 we evaluated this tool if it might serve as new GUI testtool for the SwingEditor of our CMS-product. QF-Test is a GUI testtool written in Java and with Jython as scripting language.